Online program to reduce social anxiety in university students.
Blueprints: Promising
Fjola Helgadottir, Ph.D.
AI-Therapy
Email: fjola@ai-therapy.com
Website: ai-therapy.com
Frances S. Chen, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia
The Overcome Social Anxiety program is administered online and aims to help college students improve their social anxiety through cognitive behavioral therapy. The program targets college students showing high levels of anxiety. Participants complete the program over a period of four to six months and receive email reminders to complete the modules.
The Overcome Social Anxiety program is administered online and aims to help college students improve their social anxiety through cognitive behavioral therapy. The program targets college students showing high levels of anxiety. Participants complete the program over a period of four to six months and receive email reminders to complete the modules.
The program includes seven modules, focusing on: (1) thinking exercises, (2) challenging thinking patterns, (3) creating models to deal with social anxiety, (4) experimenting behaviorally with situations that invoke social anxiety, (5) further challenging thinking, (6) self-processing, and (7) relapse prevention. Modules are individualized for the user based upon responses to a pre-questionnaire on common social anxiety thoughts and avoidance behaviors. A post-questionnaire collects the same information allowing the user to retain his/her data from before and after the treatment. A PDF generated for the user at the end of the program contains all of the exercises and the user's individualized content.
Primary Evidence Base for Certification
Study 1
McCall et al. (2018) found that at posttest, compared to control participants, intervention participants showed significantly greater reductions in:
Primary Evidence Base for Certification
The one study Blueprints has reviewed (Study 1) meets Blueprints evidentiary standards (specificity, evaluation quality, impact, dissemination readiness). The study was done by the developer.
Study 1
McCall et al. (2018) evaluated the program in 101 participants randomly assigned to intervention or waitlist control conditions. Participants self-reported their anxiety and quality of life at baseline and following the four-month online program.
Study 1
McCall, H. C., Richardson, C. G., Helgadottir, F. D., & Chen, F. S. (2018). Evaluating a web-based social anxiety intervention among university students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(3): e91. doi:10.2196/jmir.8630
Individual: Coping Skills
*
Risk/Protective Factor was significantly impacted by the program
Subgroup differences in program effects by race, ethnicity, or gender (coded in binary terms as male/female) or program effects for a sample of a specific race, ethnic, or gender group.
Study 1 (McCall et al., 2018) tested for subgroup effects with subsample analyses and found benefits for males and females but did not report tests that compared the subgroups to one another.
Sample demographics including race, ethnicity, and gender for Blueprints-certified studies:
The Study 1 sample (McCall et al., 2018) was 72% female, 48% East Asian, and 19% White.
The program is self-contained online and typically purchased directly by end users; thus, no training is necessary.
Source: Washington State Institute for Public Policy
All benefit-cost ratios are the most recent estimates published by The Washington State Institute for Public Policy for Blueprint programs implemented in Washington State. These ratios are based on a) meta-analysis estimates of effect size and b) monetized benefits and calculated costs for programs as delivered in the State of Washington. Caution is recommended in applying these estimates of the benefit-cost ratio to any other state or local area. They are provided as an illustration of the benefit-cost ratio found in one specific state. When feasible, local costs and monetized benefits should be used to calculate expected local benefit-cost ratios. The formula for this calculation can be found on the WSIPP website.
No training is necessary as the program is fully self-contained online and may be purchased directly by end users at ai-therapy.com.
Online program expense covered with purchase of license.
$50-$150 per user, depending on the number of seats in the site license. Individuals may purchase the program directly, or institutions can purchase site licenses to reduce the per user expense. Each user gets access to the program for 6 months.
None.
No information is available
No information is available
No information is available
Included with license. AI-Therapy has been online since 2012 and has performed well technically since then. However, when problems arise, users send an email to support@ai-therapy.com and their issues are solved within 1-2 working days.
Included with license. The program self-administers assessments at the beginning and at the end of the program.
No information is available
No information is available
No information is available
Individuals who are age 18 or older may purchase the program and are given access for a period of six months.
| Self-contained program for single user | $149.99 |
| Total One Year Cost | $149.99 |
The Year One expense for a single user is $149.99.
An institution may purchase a license, where the per user expense is reduced with increasing number of seats within the license. The minimum per user expense is $50.
Frances S. Chen, Ph.D.Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia3521-2136 West MallVancouver, BC V6T 1Z4Canada+1 (604) 822-2549frances.chen@psych.ubc.ca
Online program to reduce social anxiety in university students.
The program targets college students with high levels of social anxiety.
Subgroup differences in program effects by race, ethnicity, or gender (coded in binary terms as male/female) or program effects for a sample of a specific race, ethnic, or gender group.
Study 1 (McCall et al., 2018) tested for subgroup effects with subsample analyses and found benefits for males and females but did not report tests that compared the subgroups to one another.
Sample demographics including race, ethnicity, and gender for Blueprints-certified studies:
The Study 1 sample (McCall et al., 2018) was 72% female, 48% East Asian, and 19% White.
Quality of life
Individual: Coping Skills
*Risk/Protective Factor was significantly impacted by the program
The Overcome Social Anxiety program is administered online and aims to help college students improve their social anxiety through cognitive behavioral therapy. The program targets college students showing high levels of anxiety. Participants complete the program over a period of four to six months and receive email reminders to complete the modules.
The Overcome Social Anxiety program is administered online and aims to help college students improve their social anxiety through cognitive behavioral therapy. The program targets college students showing high levels of anxiety. Participants complete the program over a period of four to six months and receive email reminders to complete the modules.
The program includes seven modules, focusing on: (1) thinking exercises, (2) challenging thinking patterns, (3) creating models to deal with social anxiety, (4) experimenting behaviorally with situations that invoke social anxiety, (5) further challenging thinking, (6) self-processing, and (7) relapse prevention. Modules are individualized for the user based upon responses to a pre-questionnaire on common social anxiety thoughts and avoidance behaviors. A post-questionnaire collects the same information allowing the user to retain his/her data from before and after the treatment. A PDF generated for the user at the end of the program contains all of the exercises and the user's individualized content.
The program is based in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).
Primary Evidence Base for Certification
The one study Blueprints has reviewed (Study 1) meets Blueprints evidentiary standards (specificity, evaluation quality, impact, dissemination readiness). The study was done by the developer.
Study 1
McCall et al. (2018) evaluated the program in 101 participants randomly assigned to intervention or waitlist control conditions. Participants self-reported their anxiety and quality of life at baseline and following the four-month online program.
Primary Evidence Base for Certification
Study 1
McCall et al. (2018) found that intervention participants showed significantly greater reductions in social anxiety at posttest relative to participants in the control condition.
Primary Evidence Base for Certification
Study 1
McCall et al. (2018) found that at posttest, compared to control participants, intervention participants showed significantly greater reductions in:
Study 1 (McCall et al., 2018) reported two significant effect sizes of d = 0.72 and d = 0.82 for the two measures of social anxiety.
One study meets Blueprints standards for high-quality methods with strong evidence of program impact (i.e., "certified" by Blueprints): Study 1 (McCall et al., 2018). The sample for the study included college students with subclinical levels of social anxiety. The study took place at a large, public Canadian university and compared the treatment group to a waitlist control group.
A second study by McCall et al. (2019) examined the program's use in a more general population (mean age 35); however, this population falls outside of the scope of Blueprints and thus the study has not been reviewed by Blueprints.
McCall, H. C., Helgadottir, F. D., Menzies, R. G., Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., & Chen, F. S. (2019). An Evaluation of Community Outcomes for a Web-Based Social Anxiety Intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1), e11566. doi:10.2196/11566
Blueprints: Promising
Fjola Helgadottir, Ph.D.
AI-Therapy
Email: fjola@ai-therapy.com
Website: ai-therapy.com
Certified
McCall, H. C., Richardson, C. G., Helgadottir, F. D., & Chen, F. S. (2018). Evaluating a web-based social anxiety intervention among university students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(3): e91. doi:10.2196/jmir.8630
Summary
McCall et al. (2018) evaluated the program in 101 participants randomly assigned to intervention or waitlist control conditions. Participants self-reported their anxiety and quality of life at baseline and following the four-month online program.
McCall et al. (2018) found that at posttest, compared to control participants, intervention participants showed significantly greater reductions in:
Evaluation Methodology
Design:
Recruitment: Participants were recruited from a large, public Canadian university through an undergraduate psychology course. Students were offered course credit in exchange for participation. Inclusion criteria were showing subclinical levels of social anxiety as determined by endorsing at least one of seven items on a pre-screening questionnaire, not receiving treatment for a chronic mental health condition in the six months leading up to the study, and not having been formerly diagnosed with social anxiety by a clinician. Of the N = 264 participants who completed the eligibility questionnaire, 173 were deemed eligible to participate and 101 enrolled in the study.
Assignment: The 101 enrolled participants were randomly assigned to treatment (N = 51) or waitlist control conditions (N = 50).
Assessments/Attrition: Assessments were collected at pretest and posttest (approximately four months later). One participant assigned to the treatment condition withdrew before the study began, resulting in program participation numbers of N = 50 for both the treatment and control groups. At posttest, 65 participants provided data, resulting in an overall attrition rate of 35% from baseline to posttest. In the intervention group, 30 participants (60%) provided data at posttest and in the control group, 35 participants (70%) provided data at posttest.
Sample:
The sample consisted of Canadian public university students who had subclinical levels of social anxiety, and was 72% female, 48% East Asian, and 19% White with a mean age of 21.86 years (SD = 5.51).
Measures:
Social anxiety was measured with the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (FNE). Life satisfaction was measured with the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short form (Q-LES-Q-SF). The researchers state that all three measures are valid and reliable based on prior work.
Analysis:
Effects of the intervention on social anxiety and life satisfaction were analyzed using between-subjects t-tests comparing difference scores between intervention participants and control participants. Primary analyses were conducted on complete cases but were also replicated in five imputed datasets to address potential bias due to missing data.
Intent-to-Treat: All complete-case data were used and results were replicated in imputed datasets.
Outcomes
Implementation Fidelity:
No information on implementation fidelity was provided.
Baseline Equivalence:
Baseline equivalence was tested on three outcome variables and no significant differences were found, but no tests for equivalence on demographic characteristics were conducted. The descriptives listed in Table 1 indicate some potentially large differences (for example, proportion female was 63% in the treatment and 80% in the control).
Differential Attrition:
Tests for differential attrition were incomplete in the published article for Study 1 (McCall et al., 2018) but later provided by the study authors upon request by Blueprints. No significant differences were found in baseline social anxiety scores, quality of life, age, or gender between participants who completed the study and those who did not. The p-value for the Little test was not significant, indicating data were missing completely at random. In the intervention group, 30 participants (60%) provided data at posttest and in the control group, 35 participants (70%) provided data, though there were no tests for differences in rates between groups.
Posttest:
At posttest (four months after baseline), intervention participants showed significantly greater reductions on two of two measures of social anxiety relative to participants in the control condition. Specifically, one measure of social anxiety (the SIAS) showed a medium-large effect size of d = 0.72, and the other measure (the FNE) showed a large effect size of d = 0.82.
No significant differences were found for the third measure, the protective factor of life satisfaction.
Long-Term:
Not examined.